Anett Kontaveit vs Laura Siegemund Head-to-Head Stats, Results & Performance Comparison
By Wojtek Kolan
Form
W L W L L W L L W L
Form
L W L L L W L L L LHead To Head: Kontaveit 2 - 0 Siegemund
They have played 6 sets in total, with Kontaveit winning 4 and Siegemund winning 2. The last match between Kontaveit and Siegemund was at the Palermo Ladies Open - Palermo, 06-08-2020, Second, Clay with Anett Kontaveit getting the victory 3-6 6-2 6-2.
| Players | Head-To-Head Match Wins |
|---|---|
| Anett Kontaveit | 2 |
| Laura Siegemund | 0 |
Palermo Ladies Open - Palermo(06-08-2020)
3
6
6
2
6
2
| Kontaveit | Stats | Siegemund |
|---|---|---|
| 0% (0-0) | YTD Win/Loss | 35% (6-11) |
| 2 | Head-to-Head | 0 |
| 81 | Ranking | 95 |
| 2 | Highest Rank | 27 |
| 29 | Age | 37 |
| R | Plays | R |
| 17 | Titles | 16 |
| 66% (404-209) | Career Total W/L | 59% (532-368) |
| $5,888,999 | Career Prize Money | $2,948,445 |
| 1 | Hard H2H | 0 |
| 1 | Clay H2H | 0 |
Today’s Tennis Tips:
Alexandrova VS Kasatkina PREDICTION Clay
Mutua Madrid Open - Madrid wta
27 Apr 2025 / Third
ODDS
OUR PREDICTION
EDGE
Fritz VS Bonzi PREDICTION Clay
Mutua Madrid Open - Madrid atp
27 Apr 2025 / Third
ODDS
OUR PREDICTION
EDGE
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 3-6 6-2 6-2 |
Stats 
Anett Kontaveit
Player
Laura Siegemund
62%
(
63 of
101)
1st Serve %
71%
(
59 of
83)
4
Aces
2
5
Double Faults
7
60%
(
38 of
63)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
35 of
59)
47%
(
18 of
38)
2nd Serve Won
29%
(
7 of
24)
55%
(
6 of
11)
Break Points Won
29%
(
4 of
14)
45%
(
45 of
101)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
41 of
83)
97
Total Points Won
87
|
||||
| 2-6 6-3 6-2 |
Stats
Anett Kontaveit
Player
Laura Siegemund
69%
(
58 of
84)
1st Serve %
63%
(
49 of
78)
1
Aces
1
3
Double Faults
6
67%
(
39 of
58)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
29 of
49)
46%
(
12 of
26)
2nd Serve Won
41%
(
12 of
29)
50%
(
5 of
10)
Break Points Won
44%
(
4 of
9)
39%
(
33 of
84)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
37 of
78)
88
Total Points Won
74
|
||||
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2 | H2H Matches | 0 |
| 4 | Sets Won | 2 |
| 29 | Games Won | 21 |
| 5 | Aces (Total) | 3 |
| 8 | Total Double Faults | 13 |
| 2:7:51 | Average Match Time | 2:7:51 |
| 65% (121/185) | 1st Serve % | 67% (108/161) |
| 64% (77/121) | 1st Serve Win % | 59% (64/108) |
| 47% (30/64) | 2nd Serve Win % | 36% (19/53) |
| 52% (11/21) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 35% (8/23) |
| 48% (78/161) | Return Points Win % | 42% (78/185) |
| 100% (2/2) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 0% (0/2) |
| 0% (0/0) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 0% (0/0) |
| 100% (2/2) | Deciding Set Win % | 0% (0/2) |
| 0% (0/0) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 0% (2/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 100% (2/2) |
| 100% (2/2) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 0% (0/0) |
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
Anett Kontaveit Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R2 |
Stats
Marie Bouzkova
Player
Anett Kontaveit
60%
(
30 of
50)
1st Serve %
60%
(
26 of
43)
0
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
2
73%
(
22 of
30)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
15 of
26)
70%
(
14 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
35%
(
6 of
17)
50%
(
4 of
8)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
3)
28%
(
14 of
50)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
22 of
43)
58
Total Points Won
35
|
6-1 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Anett Kontaveit
Player
Lucrezia Stefanini
55%
(
40 of
73)
1st Serve %
65%
(
45 of
69)
2
Aces
1
4
Double Faults
3
60%
(
24 of
40)
1st Serve Won
51%
(
23 of
45)
58%
(
19 of
33)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
12 of
24)
50%
(
4 of
8)
Break Points Won
29%
(
2 of
7)
41%
(
30 of
73)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
34 of
69)
77
Total Points Won
65
|
6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Bernarda Pera
Player
Anett Kontaveit
74%
(
54 of
73)
1st Serve %
63%
(
40 of
64)
3
Aces
4
4
Double Faults
3
65%
(
35 of
54)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
25 of
40)
47%
(
9 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
29%
(
7 of
24)
57%
(
4 of
7)
Break Points Won
33%
(
2 of
6)
40%
(
29 of
73)
Rtn Points Won
50%
(
32 of
64)
76
Total Points Won
61
|
7-6(6) 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Liudmila Samsonova
Player
Anett Kontaveit
68%
(
42 of
62)
1st Serve %
71%
(
50 of
70)
3
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
2
60%
(
25 of
42)
1st Serve Won
50%
(
25 of
50)
45%
(
9 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
30%
(
6 of
20)
75%
(
6 of
8)
Break Points Won
33%
(
3 of
9)
45%
(
28 of
62)
Rtn Points Won
56%
(
39 of
70)
73
Total Points Won
59
|
6-3 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Anett Kontaveit
Player
Alycia Parks
62%
(
28 of
45)
1st Serve %
40%
(
17 of
42)
1
Aces
2
2
Double Faults
11
75%
(
21 of
28)
1st Serve Won
53%
(
9 of
17)
41%
(
7 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
20%
(
5 of
25)
60%
(
6 of
10)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
38%
(
17 of
45)
Rtn Points Won
67%
(
28 of
42)
56
Total Points Won
31
|
6-1 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Karolina Muchova
Player
Anett Kontaveit
57%
(
34 of
60)
1st Serve %
53%
(
25 of
47)
4
Aces
2
1
Double Faults
2
71%
(
24 of
34)
1st Serve Won
60%
(
15 of
25)
54%
(
14 of
26)
2nd Serve Won
32%
(
7 of
22)
56%
(
5 of
9)
Break Points Won
20%
(
1 of
5)
37%
(
22 of
60)
Rtn Points Won
53%
(
25 of
47)
63
Total Points Won
44
|
6-2 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Shelby Rogers
Player
Anett Kontaveit
63%
(
45 of
71)
1st Serve %
59%
(
39 of
66)
5
Aces
3
4
Double Faults
4
71%
(
32 of
45)
1st Serve Won
64%
(
25 of
39)
54%
(
14 of
26)
2nd Serve Won
56%
(
15 of
27)
67%
(
4 of
6)
Break Points Won
25%
(
2 of
8)
35%
(
25 of
71)
Rtn Points Won
39%
(
26 of
66)
72
Total Points Won
65
|
4-6 6-3 4-1 ret. | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Anett Kontaveit
Player
Shuai Zhang
63%
(
76 of
120)
1st Serve %
65%
(
64 of
99)
10
Aces
3
6
Double Faults
2
70%
(
53 of
76)
1st Serve Won
73%
(
47 of
64)
52%
(
23 of
44)
2nd Serve Won
49%
(
17 of
35)
50%
(
3 of
6)
Break Points Won
23%
(
3 of
13)
37%
(
44 of
120)
Rtn Points Won
35%
(
35 of
99)
111
Total Points Won
108
|
4-6 7-6(4) 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Magda Linette
Player
Anett Kontaveit
71%
(
65 of
92)
1st Serve %
69%
(
52 of
75)
7
Aces
2
2
Double Faults
4
66%
(
43 of
65)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
33 of
52)
48%
(
13 of
27)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
11 of
23)
83%
(
5 of
6)
Break Points Won
50%
(
4 of
8)
39%
(
36 of
92)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
31 of
75)
87
Total Points Won
80
|
3-6 6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Anett Kontaveit
Player
Julia Grabher
71%
(
41 of
58)
1st Serve %
48%
(
23 of
48)
1
Aces
2
1
Double Faults
4
68%
(
28 of
41)
1st Serve Won
74%
(
17 of
23)
59%
(
10 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
32%
(
8 of
25)
67%
(
4 of
6)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
34%
(
20 of
58)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
23 of
48)
61
Total Points Won
45
|
6-2 6-3 | H2H | ||
view more
Laura Siegemund Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Q1 |
Stats
Francesca Jones
Player
Laura Siegemund
58%
(
33 of
57)
1st Serve %
73%
(
49 of
67)
2
Aces
1
5
Double Faults
6
76%
(
25 of
33)
1st Serve Won
51%
(
25 of
49)
42%
(
10 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
8 of
18)
56%
(
5 of
9)
Break Points Won
100%
(
3 of
3)
39%
(
22 of
57)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
34 of
67)
69
Total Points Won
55
|
6-4 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Jule Niemeier
Player
Laura Siegemund
50%
(
59 of
119)
1st Serve %
75%
(
68 of
91)
5
Aces
2
7
Double Faults
4
63%
(
37 of
59)
1st Serve Won
66%
(
45 of
68)
58%
(
35 of
60)
2nd Serve Won
57%
(
13 of
23)
30%
(
3 of
10)
Break Points Won
22%
(
2 of
9)
39%
(
47 of
119)
Rtn Points Won
36%
(
33 of
91)
105
Total Points Won
105
|
4-6 6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Laura Pigossi
Player
Laura Siegemund
81%
(
62 of
77)
1st Serve %
72%
(
56 of
78)
0
Aces
0
0
Double Faults
5
68%
(
42 of
62)
1st Serve Won
52%
(
29 of
56)
60%
(
9 of
15)
2nd Serve Won
41%
(
9 of
22)
50%
(
6 of
12)
Break Points Won
22%
(
2 of
9)
34%
(
26 of
77)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
40 of
78)
91
Total Points Won
64
|
4-6 6-1 6-1 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Linda Fruhvirtova
Player
Laura Siegemund
71%
(
37 of
52)
1st Serve %
68%
(
30 of
44)
3
Aces
1
3
Double Faults
3
81%
(
30 of
37)
1st Serve Won
50%
(
15 of
30)
47%
(
7 of
15)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
6 of
14)
67%
(
4 of
6)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
5)
29%
(
15 of
52)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
23 of
44)
60
Total Points Won
36
|
6-1 6-2 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Laura Siegemund
Player
Ana Konjuh
67%
(
39 of
58)
1st Serve %
42%
(
25 of
59)
0
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
5
64%
(
25 of
39)
1st Serve Won
52%
(
13 of
25)
47%
(
9 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
35%
(
12 of
34)
46%
(
6 of
13)
Break Points Won
43%
(
3 of
7)
41%
(
24 of
58)
Rtn Points Won
58%
(
34 of
59)
68
Total Points Won
49
|
6-2 6-3 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Kaja Juvan
Player
Laura Siegemund
56%
(
58 of
104)
1st Serve %
73%
(
85 of
116)
3
Aces
0
7
Double Faults
8
69%
(
40 of
58)
1st Serve Won
60%
(
51 of
85)
46%
(
21 of
46)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
15 of
31)
60%
(
6 of
10)
Break Points Won
67%
(
4 of
6)
41%
(
43 of
104)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
50 of
116)
111
Total Points Won
109
|
7-5 6-7(2) 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Sorana Cirstea
Player
Laura Siegemund
68%
(
50 of
73)
1st Serve %
70%
(
53 of
76)
1
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
4
66%
(
33 of
50)
1st Serve Won
53%
(
28 of
53)
30%
(
7 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
52%
(
12 of
23)
45%
(
5 of
11)
Break Points Won
27%
(
4 of
15)
45%
(
33 of
73)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
36 of
76)
76
Total Points Won
73
|
6-3 0-6 6-1 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Cristina Bucsa
Player
Laura Siegemund
77%
(
56 of
73)
1st Serve %
71%
(
57 of
80)
1
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
5
68%
(
38 of
56)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
33 of
57)
29%
(
5 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
30%
(
7 of
23)
38%
(
5 of
13)
Break Points Won
43%
(
3 of
7)
41%
(
30 of
73)
Rtn Points Won
50%
(
40 of
80)
83
Total Points Won
70
|
6-2 7-6(2) | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Laura Siegemund
Player
Yuliia Starodubtseva
74%
(
64 of
87)
1st Serve %
59%
(
47 of
79)
1
Aces
3
4
Double Faults
3
59%
(
38 of
64)
1st Serve Won
62%
(
29 of
47)
48%
(
11 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
16 of
32)
56%
(
5 of
9)
Break Points Won
57%
(
4 of
7)
44%
(
38 of
87)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
34 of
79)
83
Total Points Won
83
|
2-6 6-2 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R3 |
Stats
Anastasia Pavlyuchenkova
Player
Laura Siegemund
64%
(
36 of
56)
1st Serve %
76%
(
41 of
54)
1
Aces
2
0
Double Faults
5
69%
(
25 of
36)
1st Serve Won
56%
(
23 of
41)
65%
(
13 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
15%
(
2 of
13)
40%
(
4 of
10)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
3)
32%
(
18 of
56)
Rtn Points Won
54%
(
29 of
54)
67
Total Points Won
43
|
6-1 6-2 | H2H | ||
view more
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 66% (404/209) | Win/Loss | 59% (532/368) |
| 63% (880/525) | Sets Win/Loss | 57% (1190/885) |
| 55% (7110/5799) | Games Win/Loss | 53% (10036/8909) |
| 61% (163/103) | Hard Win/Loss | 51% (140/134) |
| 66% (97/51) | Clay Win/Loss | 65% (339/185) |
| 74% (96/34) | Indoor Hard W/L | 53% (40/36) |
| 70% (48/21) | Grass Win/Loss | 50% (13/13) |
| 0.22 | Aces Per Game | 0.05 |
| 1367 | Aces Total | 430 |
| 0.23 | Double Faults Per Game | 0.18 |
| 1454 | Total Double Faults | 1632 |
| 1:1:52 | Average Match Time | 1st Match |
| 432.22 | Average Opponent Rank | 476.5 |
| 62% (18354/29705) | 1st Serve % | 70% (23763/33976) |
| 66% (12165/18354) | 1st Serve Win % | 60% (14276/23763) |
| 46% (5257/11350) | 2nd Serve Win % | 46% (4706/10195) |
| 47% (1641/3509) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 48% (2128/4473) |
| 44% (12933/29272) | Return Points Win % | 46% (15844/34268) |
| 57% (47/35) | Slam W/L | 52% (42/39) |
| 56% (62/49) | Masters W/L | 53% (47/41) |
| 68% (15/7) | Cups W/L | 57% (4/3) |
| 66% (136/71) | Main Tour W/L | 57% (142/109) |
| 0% (0/0) | Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) |
| 71% (98/40) | Challenger W/L | 60% (239/157) |
| 87% (46/7) | Futures W/L | 75% (58/19) |
| 66% (398/603) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 59% (524/887) |
| 33% (1/3) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 50% (2/4) |
| 56% (76/135) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 52% (93/178) |
| 59% (108/183) | Deciding Set Win % | 54% (151/282) |
| 90% (386/346) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 87% (512/443) |
| 10% (386/39) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 13% (512/69) |
| 25% (227/57) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 23% (387/88) |
Other Predictions
Today's Tennis Prediction News :
- Loading news...
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us [email protected]
